The Influence Of Learning Facilities And Learning Independence On Students’ Learning Outcomes In Information And Communication Technology Subjects At Senior High School Level

Authors

  • Chrysto Faldo Fortunando Universitas PGRI Pontianak,Ampera Raya,Kota Pontianak,Kalimantan Barat,Indonesia Author
  • Ferry Marlianto Universitas PGRI Pontianak,Ampera Raya,Kota Pontianak,Kalimantan Barat,Indonesia Author
  • Henny Puspitasari Universitas PGRI Pontianak,Ampera Raya,Kota Pontianak,Kalimantan Barat,Indonesia Author

Abstract

Introduction: Mastery of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has become an essential competency for students in the digital era. However, the effectiveness of ICT-based learning is shaped by both external and internal factors, particularly the availability of adequate learning facilities and the level of students’ learning independence.

Method: This study applied a quantitative ex-post facto design involving a saturated sample of 72 tenth-grade students enrolled in ICT subjects at SMA Karya Budi Putussibau. Data were collected using questionnaires, observations, and interviews. Instrument validity and reliability were tested using Pearson Product-Moment and Cronbach’s Alpha. Data were analysed using classical assumption testing and multiple linear regression with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Findings indicate that learning facilities and learning independence each have a significant positive effect on ICT learning outcomes. Furthermore, both variables simultaneously explain 70.4% of the variance in student performance, reflected in the regression model . Learning facilities contributed more strongly compared to learning independence.

Discussion: The results reinforce theoretical perspectives emphasizing the interplay between contextual resources and self-regulated learning. Adequate ICT facilities provide essential access and learning opportunities, while learning independence determines students’ ability to utilize such resources effectively. The findings align with global evidence underscoring the importance of both environmental support and learner autonomy in technology-integrated education.

Conclusion: Improving ICT learning outcomes requires a dual approach: strengthening infrastructure quality while simultaneously cultivating student self-regulation and independence. Schools and policymakers should balance technological investment with pedagogical efforts that empower students to become autonomous digital learners.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiyanti, Y. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas dalam penelitian. Jurnal Analisis dan Eksperimen, 12(2), 137–141.

Agustina, S. (2015). Pengaruh kemandirian belajar siswa dan fasilitas belajar di sekolah terhadap prestasi belajar Keterampilan Komputer dan Pengelolaan Informasi (KKPI) siswa kelas XI Jurusan Administrasi Perkantoran SMK Kosgoro 3 Kedawung Sragen Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Pembelajarannya, 3(1), 1–10.

Ambarsari, I. (2019). Pengaruh kelengkapan fasilitas belajar dan kemandirian belajar terhadap prestasi belajar ekonomi pada siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Surakarta, 5(4), 9–25.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal DATA, 5(1), 1–5.

Damanik, B. E. (2019). Pengaruh fasilitas dan lingkungan belajar terhadap motivasi belajar. Publikasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 46–52.

Habibah, U., Murtini, W., & Murwaningsih, T. (2019). Pengaruh fasilitas belajar dan kemandirian peserta didik terhadap prestasi belajar di SMK Negeri 1 Surakarta. Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran, 3(1), 37–49.

Hasibuan, I. (2015). Hasil belajar siswa pada materi bentuk aljabar di kelas X SMP Negeri 1 Banda Aceh tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Peluang, 4(1), 5–11.

Isnawati, N., & Samian. (2020). Kemandirian belajar ditinjau dari kreativitas belajar dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal UMS, 1(5), 128–144.

Linasari, R., & Arif, S. (2022). Pengaruh kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas XI SMP. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 2(2), 186–194.

Mulyadi, M., & Syahid, A. (2020). Faktor pembentuk dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 197–214.

Nasution, S. (2017). Variabel penelitian. Raudhah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 1–9.

Nasution, T. (2018). Membangun kemandirian siswa melalui pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya, 2(1), 1–19.

Ngatno. (2015). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian (Edisi ke-1). Media Atlantis Press.

Nurhasanah, S., & Sobandi, A. (2016). Hasil belajar sebagai determinan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 128–135.

Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan media pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Hadist, Syari’ah dan Tarbiyah, 3(1), 171–187.

Prayuda, R., Thomas, Y., & Basri, M. (2018). Pengaruh kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 3(8), 1–10.

Puspadita, D. D. (2018). Hubungan kemandirian belajar dan fasilitas belajar dengan hasil belajar biologi kelas XI IPA SMA N 2 Koto XI Tarusan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Tarusan, 6(3), 1–81.

Qomariyah, A. N., & Wulandari, S. S. (2021). Pengaruh kemandirian belajar dan sarana prasarana pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(2), 141–154.

Ratu, H., Negara, P., Riska, K., & Kurniawati, A. (2022). Pengaruh penggunaan fasilitas belajar di rumah dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 113–122.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Parama Publishing.

Rijal, S., & Bachtiar, S. (2015). Hubungan antara sikap, kemandirian belajar, dan gaya belajar dengan hasil belajar kognitif siswa. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 3(2), 15–20.

Rubiyanti. (2017). Pengaruh kemandirian, fasilitas, dan hasil belajar terhadap prestasi belajar sosiologi. Jurnal Ideguru, 2(1), 12–21.

Siahaan, C. D., & Pramusinto, H. (2018). Pengaruh disiplin belajar, lingkungan sekolah, dan fasilitas belajar terhadap hasil belajar. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 279–285.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-3). Alfabeta.

Sutriani, E., & Octaviani, R. (2019). Analisis data dan pengecekan keabsahan data. Jurnal Unsemar, 15(44), 1–22.

Taufik. (2021). Hipotesis penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 3(2).*

Wicaksono, A. (2015). Penelitian kausal komparatif (Ex Post Facto). Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(5), 1–11.

Zulfia, R., & Syofyan, E. (2015). Pengaruh fasilitas belajar di rumah, hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar komputer akuntansi di SMK Kabupaten Agam. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi, 2(1), 1–10.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

1.
The Influence Of Learning Facilities And Learning Independence On Students’ Learning Outcomes In Information And Communication Technology Subjects At Senior High School Level. IJSET [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 16 [cited 2026 Feb. 27];2(2). Available from: https://ijset.ariyapublisher.com/index.php/ijset/article/view/14